In the Shadow of Violent Men: Emancipation and Moral Autonomy in The Last of Us and The Last of Us Part II
Keywords:
autonomy, morality, particularism, gender, identity, objectification, empowermentAbstract
This paper offers an interpretation of The Last of Us and The Last of Us Part II as narratives of moral emancipation from patriarchal structures. It argues that the protagonists, Ellie and Abby, participate in the construction of each other’s moral agency and autonomy, while navigating their complex gender identities and attempting to break the cycles of violence and retaliation initiated by their fathers. Neither character succeeds in the end. Indeed, the games’ main argument is that if moral autonomy is ever within reach, it is not on individualistic or universalistic terms; that is, that the notion itself of being autonomous is necessarily relational, gradual, and situated within the gender politics of each character’s moral particularity.
References
Alexander, L. (2013, 2 July). The Last of Us is the least we should ask of games. Gamasutra. http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/195423/The_Last_of_Us_is_the_least_we_should_ask_of_games.php
Bechdel, A. (2006). Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic. Houghton Mifflin.
Brice, M. (2013, 15 August). The dadification of video games is real. Alternate Ending. http://www.mattiebrice.com/the-dadification-of-video-games-is-real/
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
Coles, A. (2020, 9 July). The rampant body-shaming of Abby in The Last of Us Part II shows gamers still can’t accept a realistic female lead. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/last-of-us-2-abby-gaming-naughty-dog-a9609616.html
Favis, E. (2020, 1 July). The evolution of Ellie. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/video-games/news/the-last-of-us-part-2-ellie-evolution/
Flores, N. (2020, 14 July). The Last of Us Part II shows a gender double standard for violence. fanbyte. https://www.fanbyte.com/trending/the-last-of-us-part-ii-shows-a-gender-double-standard-for-violence/
Gibson, E. (2013, 5 July). The Last of Us isn’t the solution to sexism in games, but it’s a start. Eurogamer. https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-07-05-the-last-of-us-isnt-the-solution-to-sexism-in-games-but-its-a-start
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.
Glennon, J., Johnston, D., & Francisco, E. (2020, 14 May). The Last of Us 2 trans controversy, explained. Inverse. https://www.inverse.com/gaming/last-of-us-2-trans-controversy-explained-abby-tlou
Green, A. (2016). The reconstruction of morality and the evolution of naturalism in The Last of Us. Games and Culture, 11(7-8), 745-763.
Hasty, O. (2004). Memory, consciousness, and time in Nabokov’s Lolita. KronoScope, 4(2), 225-238.
Held, V. (2007). The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford University Press.
Hughes, P.M., & Warmke, B. (2017). Forgiveness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/forgiveness/
Kant, I. (1788). The Critique of Practical Reasoning. Retrieved from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5683/5683-h/5683-h.htm
Kauffmann, L. (1989). Framing Lolita: is there a woman in the text? In P. Yaeger, B. Kowaleski-Wallace, & J. Aline Flieger (Eds.),
Refiguring the Father: New Feminist Readings of Patriarchy (p. 131-52). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Kean, D. (2017, 13 March). Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie clarifies transgender comments as backlash grows. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/mar/13/chimamanda-ngozi-adichie-clarifies-transgender-comments
Kymlicka, W. (1989). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Clarendon Press.
Locke, J. (1690). Two Treatises of Government. Retrieved from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/7370/7370-h/7370-h.htm
Lota, K. (2014, 27 May). Subverting player choice in The Last of Us and Bioshock: Infinite. Ethos Review. http://www.ethosreview.org/cultural-interventions/subverting-player-choice/
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.
MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard University Press.
Muncy, J. (2020, 21 July). The trans narrative in ‘The Last of Us Part II’ is compelling. There’s so much more to be done. The
Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2020/07/21/trans-narrative-last-us-part-ii-is-compelling-theres-so-much-more-be-done/
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2016). Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice. Oxford University Press.
Oakley, A. (2014). Father and Daughter: Patriarchy, Gender and Social Science. Bristol University Press.
Paez, D. (2020, 7 July). Last of Us Part 2 ending detail hints Ellie’s fate wasn’t so grim after all. Inverse. https://www.inverse.com/gaming/last-of-us-2-ending-explained-fan-theory-ellie-abby
Petit, C. (2013, 3 July). The Last of Us and grading on the gender curve. Gamespot. https://www.gamespot.com/articles/the-last-of-us-and-grading-on-the-gender-curve/1100-6411051/
Plante, C., & Reindeau, D. (2013, 23 July). Let’s talk about: the ending of The Last of Us. Polygon. https://www.polygon.com/2013/7/24/4548992/the-ending-of-the-last-of-us
Plath, S. (1965). Ariel. Faber and Faber.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press.
Rothman, B.K. (1996). Daddy plants a seed: personhood under patriarchy. Hastings Law Journal, 47(4), 1241-1248.
Ryan, H. (2020, 2 July). How The Last of Us Part II brought lesbian representation to gaming. i-D Vice. https://i-d.vice.com/en_uk/article/8898w5/lesbian-representation-video-games-the-last-of-us-part-2-ellie-dina
Saavedra, J. (2020, 24 June). The Last of Us Part 2: Abby’s fate explained. Den of Geek. https://www.denofgeek.com/games/the-last-of-us-part-2-abby-ending-lev-joel-ellie-spoilers/
Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Schubert, S. (2021). Playing as/against violent women: imagining gender in the postapocalyptic landscape of The Last of Us Part II. Gender Forum, 80, 30-54.
Stang, S. (2017). Big daddies and broken men: father-daughter relationships in video games. Loading..., 10(16), 162-174.
Stuart, K. (2013, 1 July). The Last of Us, Bioshock: Infinite, and why all video games dystopias work the same way. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/gamesblog/2013/jul/01/last-of-us-bioshock-infinite-male-view
Sullentrop, C. (2013, 14 June). In the same boat, but not equals. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/arts/video-games/in-the-video-game-the-last-of-us-survival-favors-the-man.html
Suvin, D. (1979). Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. Yale University Press.
Trumbore, D. (2020, 23 July). ‘Last of Us 2’: Naughty Dog’s cast and creative team comment on that divisive ending. Collider. https://collider.com/last-of-us-2-ending-meaning/
Vella, D. (2014). Modeling the semiotic structure of game characters. In Proceedings of the 2014 DiGRA International Conference, 8. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/digra2014_submission_40.pdf
Voorhees, G. (2016). Daddy issues: constructions of fatherhood in The Last of Us and BioShock Infinite. ADA: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 9. Retrieved from http://adanewmedia.org/2016/05/issue9-voorhees/
Wakefield, L. (2020, 19 June). The Last of Us Part II condemned as ‘trauma porn’ over trans abuse plot. PinkNews. https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/06/19/the-last-of-us-part-2-transgender-trans-character-lev-reaction/
Wallace, K. (2014, 9 April). The art of endings: Tales of ending a game. Game Informer. https://www.gameinformer.com/index.php/b/features/archive/2014/04/09/the-art-of-endings-tales-of-ending-a-game.aspx
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Claudio D'Amato

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright for work in this journal is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. In keeping with a Creative Commons license, articles are free to use with proper attribution (to both the author and Loading…) for educational and other non-commercial uses.